Sex, Drugs & Unix

Thursday, September 30th

Greatest Moment in Wacked Out Real Science



Couple years ago, some people I worked with finally completed a long-delayed
project to build a very large vacuum chamber for testing plasma thrusters and
other advanced spacecraft propulsion systems. Not the biggest in the business,
but maybe top ten nationwide. Big enough to walk around inside, at any rate,
which is the important point.

Important, because in order to go operational it needed the approval of the
local Safety Nazis. You know the type. They have a checklist, nay, a whole
handbook of checklists, one of which involves Confined Spaces. Big enough
to walk around in? Check. Airtight? Check. Can be filled with asphyxiant
gas? Well, the MSDS for "Vacuum" apparently lists it as an "asphyxiant", so
check. It's a Confined Space, and so the Confined Space checklist must be
implemented.

Issue the first: How do they make certain nobody can accidentally walk in while
the chamber is full of that deadly asphyxiant, "vacuum"? No, the fifty *tons*
of force holding the door closed, is not an acceptable answer.

Issue the second: When the chamber is vented back to full atmospheric pressure,
where does the vacuum go? If the chamber were accidentally vented by opening
the door (see above, and note exact Safety Nazi quote, "OK, say if you were
Superman and you opened the door"), where would the vacuum go?

Issue the third: What assurance is there, that when the chamber is vented back
to full atmosphere, there is an adequate percentage of oxygen in the chamber?
Hint: It is a big, big, big mistake here to acknowledge here that the laws of
statistical gas dynamics allow for one chance in 10^10^17 (no typo) that the
chamber will spontaneously refill with a sufficiently oxygen-poor atmosphere
to preclude respiration.

Issue the forth, and so help me God I am not making this up, again an exact
Safety Nazi quote, "How can you be sure there won't be vacuum pockets left
in the chamber, that someone could accidentally stick their head into?"

And, coupled with issue #2, there could be deadly vacuum pockets floating
around the lab! Aieeee!!!! Run for your lives!

It only took three weeks to find someone with the common sense and the real
authority to overrule the Safety Nazis on this one, and the SNs still take
offense if anyone brings it up in their presence.

link




Jim on 09.30.04 @ 11:34 AM PST [link]


Tuesday, September 28th

Clothes make the geek



If you're a nerd, you can understand how important clothes are by asking yourself how you'd feel about a company that made you wear a suit and tie to work. The idea sounds horrible, doesn't it? In fact, horrible far out of proportion to the mere discomfort of wearing such clothes. A company that made programmers wear suits would have something deeply wrong with it.

And what would be wrong would be that how one presented oneself counted more than the quality of one's ideas. That's the problem with formality. Dressing up is not so much bad in itself. The problem is the receptor it binds to: dressing up is inevitably a substitute for good ideas. It is no coincidence that technically inept business types are known as "suits."

Nerds don't just happen to dress informally. They do it too consistently. Consciously or not, they dress informally as a prophylactic measure against stupidity."

Excerpted from, What the Bubble Got Right by Paul Graham
Jim on 09.28.04 @ 06:45 PM PST [link]



Friday, September 24th

Wooden ships and iron men


We offer the following from a tale related by the chief curator of the National Park Service, and printed in no less an authoritative source than Oceanographic Ships, Fore and Aft, published by the Oceanographer of the Navy. We quote:

"On August 23, 1779, the USS Constitution set sail from Boston loaded with 475 officers and men, 48,600 gallons of water, 74,000 cannon shot, 11,500 pounds of black powder and 79,400 gallons of rum. Her mission: to destroy and harass English shipping.

On October 6, she made Jamaica, took on 826 pounds of flour and 68,300 gallons of rum. Three weeks later the Constitution reached the Azores, where she provisioned with 550 pounds of beef and 6,300 gallons of Portugese wine.

On November 18, the ship set sail for England where her crew captured and scuttled 12 English merchant vessels and took aboard their rum.

But the Constitution had run out of shot. Nevertheless, she made her way unarmed up the Firth of Clyde for a night raid. Here her landing party captured a whiskey distillery, transferred 40,000 gallons aboard and headed for home.

On February 20, 1780, the Constitution arrived in Boston with no cannon shot, no food, no powder, no rum, no whiskey. Just 38,600 gallons of water."

We refrain from comment, other than this breif analysis:

Length of cruise -- 181 days

Booze consumption -- 2.25 gallons per man per day (plus whatever they liberated from the 12 English merchant ships).



Jim on 09.24.04 @ 06:07 AM PST [link]


SUNW .vs the world


Says here (and here, and here, and, of course, here) that Sun is now aiming its guns at linux, via FUDing RedHat.



I'm almost embarassed to admit it now, but I used to work there. However, even when I was there (1989-1992), I predicted that Sun would be the DEC of the 90s. Data General was the wrong comparison to make. DG failed because they fell behind. DEC failed because they arrogantly assumed that the world wouldn't change, so the continued to build everything themselves, (they made their own disk-drives, for God's sake!), while simultaneously ignoring Unix on microprocessors. Then they partnered with Microsoft in an attempt to get back on top of the game. Microsoft famously ripped off Digital's VMS, and turned it into Windows NT. The result was that Compaq eventually purchased the ghost of the once mighty DEC, and then Compaq and HP merged. Today DEC is buried in an unmarked grave.

McNealy once publicly described Windows NT as "a giant hairball", and only two years ago, Sun declared its love for linux, with McNealy wearing a penguin suit.

Sun has recently partnered with MS, and garnered $1.5 Billion (US) for whoring itself to the Pimpmaster Gates. By itself this could kill Sun if it is not very careful. Gates will eventually get pissed off, and try to smack his bitch (McNealy) down. Nobody yet has outplayed Microsoft at the "partner with Microsoft" game. Apple has perhaps come closest, but as many others have said, Microsoft needs Apple to stay in business. Other than Apple, the MSFT endgame always has the partner on its knees, begging for its life.

Sun has recently thrown OpenOffice to the wolves. Jonathan Schwartz answered with

Please do not listen to the bizarro numbskull anti-Sun conspiracy theorists. They were lunatics then, they are lunatics now, they will always be lunatics. We love the open source community, we spawned from it. We'll protect that community, that innovation, and our place in it, with all our heart and energy.


And now Sun wants to equate Linux with Redhat. That might have worked a few years ago, but SuSE is now part of Novell, and IBM has invested heavily in it. Does Sun not realize that SuSE moved into the neighborhood, and that any assult on Linux will be answered by the combination of IBM and Novell?

Redhat, for its part, is attempting to suck-up to MSFT, and earning MS-like badwill, and the result is that FedoraCore is all-the-rage, and RedHat Enterprise Linux will soon be as obscure as Slackware.

IBM and Sun are still focused on big iron. Meanwhile, Google has demonstrated that many applications work well with a large server farm of generic PCs. As Eugene Brooks once famously commented, "You cannot stop the attack of the killer micros." Mr. Brooks was talking about RISC CPUs, and Intel/AMD seem to have pushed RISC back into a corner, for now. Sun's problem is that it can't figure out how to survive on the margins inherent in commodity boxes. Just like Microsoft, they need the extra margin that a licensed OS brings. However, generic boxes are here to stay, despite the best efforts of the gang of dinasaurs who ruled high-tech during the 90s. In the meantime, companies such as IBM have thrived on linux.

Sun is undertaking a PR war against a target that doesn't need to take part in the combat. Linux is highly distributed by its very nature, and it posesses the ultimate guerilla marketing tactics. It's impossible to win a guerrilla war against a highly distributed enemy. Something can nuke you from behind and when you turn around, its gone.

Sun has made a huge mistake, if they're lucky, this "trial balloon" will show the error, and they'll try something else. Otherwise, they will be the Next DEC.

Microsoft Corporation will be best remembered for its blue screen of death, a randomly occuring, incomprehensible, bright blue message would appear, glibly informing you that your machine has, yet again, crashed and that you've lost all your work and you're going to have to reboot.

Hopefully the planes don't crash while this happens.


Jim on 09.24.04 @ 05:21 AM PST [link]


Thursday, September 23rd

Marriage of the desperate


Nomadix partners with Firetide

Nomadix, Inc., the leading supplier of Public-access solutions and Firetide, a leader in wireless mesh networking, today announceda joint marketing agreement to enable customers and solution providers to save time and money in rolling out and operating Public-access networks.The Nomadix–Firetide partnership brings together Nomadix Access Gateways running the Nomadix Service EngineTM (NSE) and Firetide HotPointTM Wireless MeshRouters. This combined solution is ideal for environments such as hotels, RV parks, airports, convention centers, and municipalities, where structuredwiring such as Ethernet or fiber cabling is too difficult or costly to install.

“We are pleased to be working with Firetide to provide the industry with a cost-effective, easy to deploy solution for installation of large scale hot zones,” said Kurt Bauer, President and CEO of Nomadix. “From the initial WLAN installation through the seamless user experience, Firetide and Nomadix lead the way in simplifying Public-access operation for service providers and venue operators.”

The Nomadix Service Engine™ (NSE) addresses the key issues of customer acquisition, provisioning, security and revenue generation faced by providers and venue owners when deploying Public-access networks. The NSE eliminates barriers encountered by end users accessing these networks and provides a problem-free experience.Nomadix offers a full range of Access Gateways running the NSE software. All Access Gateways come with the NSE Core software package.

Firetide’s HotPoint™ wireless mesh routers use advanced routing technologies and IEEE 802.11-compliant radios to “unwire” the Ethernet backhaul and create a self-configuring, self-healing mesh network. This eliminates the need to wire access points back to a network switch. Firetide Wireless Instant Networks scaleand self-configure instantly by simply plugging HotPoints into standard AC power outlets, resulting in a simple and reliable alternative to standard Ethernet cable.

“The combination of Firetide’s mesh backhaul solution and Nomadix Public-access Gateways makes it possible to implement wireless hot spots virtually anywhere – indoorsand outdoors – quickly and easily,” said Bo Larsson, CEO of Firetide. “Carriers, service providers, wireless ISPs and venue owners can now profitably meet the growingdemand for broadband Internet access.”

The Nomadix–Firetide agreement enables the companies’ sales and marketing teams to work together on channel programs, cross-training, joint-marketing and sales, and customer opportunities.


These things never work out well. I'm sure that the post-honeymoon period will be more like Voyage of the Damned.

Both companies have new CEOs. Bo Larsson didn't last long at Emuzed, and admits that he can't sit still. Bauer moved up from VP of Field Ops, which I find highly questionable, unless Nomadix is now a deployment services company. Maybe thats the only place the board could insert him on his way into the company. I know the BoD at Firetide picked Mr. Larsson, but only after allowing the company to flounder for months, losing most of the momentum it had.

Neither company has any real technology base. Firetide licensed TBRPF from , and runs it, and FreeBSD on a Soekris board. (The Tropos solution is very similar.) As for Nomadix, I've already made public statements about the Nomadix Patent.

New CEOs, new partnerships, it all spells near-certain doom to me. I've been through that dance once or twice.

Life's a piece of shit,
When you look at it.
Life's a laugh and death's a joke it's true.
You'll see it's all a show.
Keep 'em laughing as you go.
Just remember that the last laugh is on you.
And...

Always look on the bright side of life.
Jim on 09.23.04 @ 07:44 PM PST [link]


Microsoft, GetTickCount(), LAX and the FAA


Doc wonders outloud at IT Garage Did the air traffic control center really have a "Microsoft server crash"?

The only apparent source for the TechWorld story is the LA Times story. I suppose, as "The UK's Infrastructure & network knowledge center" (says the slogan), TechWorld felt a need to alert its readers to a danger that the LA Times writers buried down toward the end of their story. I don't know.

So now I'm wondering... Is this "design anomaly" thing grounds for criticism of anything other than the design decisions behind some software? By the LA Times report, the software itself didn't fail, right? This wasn't a blue-screen kind of thing. It was a weird default, rather than a "server crash". In other words, it's something that's also correctible in software as well.

I bring all this up becuase I'm not sure this is one of those cases where Microsoft deserves the bashing it often (and sometimes deservedly) gets.

Is it?

Maybe.

Here are two stories, both independent of the LA Times writer (both authored by the same guy).

Here is the CNN story (which may or may not be independent) as well as another Potentially independent, blog-like write-up.

The issue is likely related to the GetTickCount() function in the Windows API. This function counts the number of milliseconds since the OS was last booted, and can "rollover" after 49.7 days.

/home/jim> bc -lq
2^32/(86400*1000)
49.71026962962962962962

Although it won't crash, Win2K can have a highly similar problem if your application depends on RPC.
----
SYMPTOMS
The Rpcss.exe process consumes 60 percent or more of CPU time, and system performance and network performance are affected. This symptom typically occurs 49.7 days after the server is started.
CAUSE
This problem occurs because a call to the GetTickCount timer function causes the function to overflow 49.7 days after the server is started.
----
rpcss.exe is reponsible for Remote Procedure Call services on the local machine. Perhaps the Harris software depends on RPC. Remember that the LA times story said that there was a resource problem, "'to prevent data overload", perhaps this is the source of it.

There are other Microsoft-written Windows apps (even for Win2K) that offer similar bugs.

If the RPC server issue (above) is not the culprit, then it is likely that problem here is the software written by Harris does not handle a rollover of the GetTickCount() function.

If so, the poorly written Harris software contains a bug and the FAA-mandated solution (which was really not that bad of a work around) was to manually reboot the system every 30 days, but as a fail-safe, they had a scheduled task to do a reboot on the 49th day just in case. The 49th day came because of procedural error.

Still, Harris claims; "The system offers unprecedented voice quality, touch-screen technology, dynamic reconfiguration capabilities to meet changing needs, and an operational availability of 0.9999999"

If I have to reboot a server every month, and meet 7-9s reliability, it had better reboot quickly. .0000001 of a month is 0.27 seconds, and that assumes the month has 31 days.

/home/jim> bc -lq
31*86400*(1-0.9999999)
.2678400

The real issue is of couse the culture around Windows that assumes that a reboot is the appropriate fix for software coding errors. The programmers at Microsoft assumed that no machine would stay up 50 days. I've seen busy Unix and Linux boxes th at can go years between reboots.


Jim on 09.23.04 @ 05:25 AM PST [link]


Tuesday, September 21st

Microsoft (almost) kills


A bug in a Microsoft system compounded by human error was ultimately responsible for a three-hour radio breakdown that left hundreds of aircraft aloft without guidance on Tuesday, according to a report in the LA Times.

Nearly all of Southern California's airports were shut down and five incidents where aircraft broke separation guidelines were reported. In one case, a pilot had to take evasive action.

link
Jim on 09.21.04 @ 04:06 PM PST [link]


Monday, September 20th

Sabermetrics for startups


The study of baseball statistics is called Sabermetrics

In bnoopy.typepad.com Joe Kraus (one of the founders of Excite) asks, "Has anyone done Sabermetrics for startups?"

Well, I don't have an answer just yet, but I'm thinking a lot about it. In general, I think that the technology people market overvalues certain VP-level jobs, typically in marketing and business development relative to these positions impact on a company's success (how often have you seen the "killer" VP of marketing get brought in with some huge salary and equity package to save a company and end up not having much effect?) On the other side, I think the market generally undervalues key engineering hires relative to their contributions.

Why does this happen? For a few reasons, I think. First, most CEOs are not technical (I'm not either). So, they tend to highly value the things they understand (marketing, business dev, sales) and undervalue the things they don't (engineering). Second, people are more attracted to people like themselves. Come from marketing and you'll probably pay more for marketing people. Third, and perhaps most importantly, is the fact that there are no identified fact-based metrics that help CEOs understand how to value engineers.


Jim on 09.20.04 @ 01:36 PM PST [link]


Spokane really does suck


Greg Taylor tells it again, Spokane doth suck. If you're considering moving there, don't.



Jim on 09.20.04 @ 01:20 PM PST [link]


Marketing bullspin 101


Vivato continues its lame attempts to market its way out of the hole.

I just stumbled across this piece of marketing bullshit.

A total of 5 Vivato Wi-Fi Base Stations and 12 Vivato Outdoor AP/Bridges are installed throughout the downtown area to provide wireless connectivity to a 100 block of core downtown area. This core is about a 1.0 mile long an about 0.32 mile wide as designated in Figure 15 by a white outline.

By their own admission, the "Base Stations" are $14,000 each, plus an additional $10,000 in "professional engineering services". The dozen AP/bridge units, taken as a whole don't cost half of what each "basestation" does. Ignoring the AP/Bridge units, someone spent $125,000 to install those 5 "basestations".

Wireless phased array base station installations such as the rooftop deployment, shown in Figure 3, can cost on the order of $14,000 plus an additional $10,000 to install with professional engineering services. Given the efficiencies of this type of equipment, however, a coverage cost of 0.03 to 0.5 cents per square foot is realized. As a result the square mile deployment discussed above can drop to less than $20,000. This investment can be justified again when mobile workforce productivity improvements are taken into account.

My math says there are 27,878,400 sqare feet in a square mile. Vivato claims this deployment is 0.32 square miles, for 8,921,088 square feet of coverage that costs $125,000 to install, not including the 12 Outdoor "AP/Bridges" and their additional "professional engineering". This results in a cost of coverage of $0.0140, or 1.40 cents per square mile, some 2.8X to an incredible 46X the cost of coverage stated earlier in the document. The document goes on to claim:

Again the 5 Wi-Fi Base Stations additionally provide direct access to clients over many square miles around the 100 block city core.

but of course, this coverage is incidental to the goal. Readers of the markeing malarky should consider that additional deliberate coverage will probably cost as much as the original 1/3 square mile did. Assuming that things scale, and that the swtiches don't become an obstacle to each other, each additional square mile will cost in excess of $400,000.

According to the United States Census Bureau, the geographic area of the city of Spokane is approximately 57.8 square miles. If the above cost of coverage holds, it would cost some $23,120,000 in order to completely cover Spokane.

Follow the money. Spokane is only concerned about its parking problems around the Parkade, since they have to pay for it, somehow.

Further, (and back to the technology), such excess coverage may even be harmful to the deployment. 802.11 is based on CSMA/CA, and is therefore required to stop and wait if there is a strong signal being received from any source. Vivato knows this, since its "basestations" have electronics that stop all "beams" on a given channel from sending while any of them is receiving a packet.

It turns out to be impossible to ignore the incoming frames if they're 802.11. Vivato has no ability to filter what is referred to internally as "OBSS" traffic, nor are they likely to ever gain such technology.

If there are 802.11 devices inside the coverage area that aren't part of the Vivato-supplied network, the switch will pend all transmits on the channel(s) where the OBSS traffic exists. A simple extrapolation will show that there are (and will always be) more OBSS traffic than traffic destined for the Vivato switch.

This was the primary factor that drove the "multichannel" fervor inside parts of Vivato. The hope was that by being able to simultaneously operate on multiple channels, the switch wouldn't become blocked. The sad truth is that multichannel operation makes the "basestation" interfere with itself, with mean beam-to-beam inteference of 9dB.

Someone inside Vivato should check the definition of SIR, btw. I'd much rather have 30dB SIR than 0dB SIR (a 0dB SIR would make decoding the signal... difficult) pictured on page 18. I believe they wanted ISR (interference to signal ratio) instead of SIR.

Jim on 09.20.04 @ 01:07 PM PST [link]


Friday, September 17th

The horror. The horror.


So Microsoft appears to be retracting its position on blogger RSS bandwidth. Really now, this couldn't have been about bandwidth, the company sends HUGE binary patches out to its base of dope-addicts on a regular basis. Compared to that, a bunch of RSS feeds are sprinkles on icing on the cake. No, this had to be about the marketing department's sudden awareness that they were no longer relevant.

On other fronts, I had a great meeting today with some of MSDN's site managers. One of the interesting things that they pointed out is that in general, the blog entries that we host on our dev centers get more click-throughs than our headlines. Now, headlines are the holy grail at lots of websites - we put lots of time and energy into thinking about what we headline. It's the topic of much (heated) debate, and it often takes several people several hours to decide on all the headlines for a week.

Blogs written by the well-informed can break the back of a corporation. (Comment on spineLESS corporate management hereby referenced and omitted.) The corporate types can get in a complete WAD about a current or former employee who "leaks" the corporate secrets in full view of the public. I know of one company who has new text in their employment and contracting agreements that attempts to stop this practice. All I can say in response is that tightening one's fist is entirely Napoleonic in nature and stature.

Why is it that despots are typically short, and always fear freedom? Is it just short man's syndrome?

Occasionally, an alternate response takes root. From the "anything they can do we can do better" deparment, corporate blogs attempt to the repurpose the one-to-many leverage of the weblog into more traditional marketing. The result is oft too heavy-handed, and smacks of PR and spin. Occasionally though, it reveals the true extent of the terror present in the mind of the blog-author

Back before SPARC completely ran out of steam and Sun found itself behind the curve of Moore's law, Sun pushed/promoted SPARC as the only viable microprocessor architecture. They predicted 1.5GHz UltraSPARC by 2002. In 2002, after UltraSPARC managed only 1.05GHz, Sun confidently predicted UltraSPARC would go to 3GHz. As of this date, the fastest UltraSPARC IV is 1.2GHz, and UltraSPARC V was canceled in July.

The timing couldn't have been worse, with Sun already suffering with the hangover of the dot-bomb crash. While Sun claims to still be pushing SPARC forward, the truth is that the architecture ran out of steam, so Sun started its
step-n-repeat fork of the SPARC architecture. Multiprocessing is so in-vogue today that even PeeCees are getting it. Both Opteron and Intel's next-generation are due for multi-core chips, and IBM's Power5 CPU has it as well. Sun's strategy seems to be that since SPARC can be implemented in fewer transistors, they can fit more CPU equivalents on a chip.

But this was a blog entry about corporate blogs.

IBM recently decided to go linux-only for its (ahem) "low-end" servers. In repsonse to IBM's latest move of inexpensive (for them) Power5 hardware that ships with linux, Jonathan Schwartz has previewed the resultant part and early boards in his blog. Mr. Schwartz claims that the part is "alrady running Solaris". The unanswered question, of course, is "does it run linux?"

I bet it doesn't, for now.

The interesting thing for me is that here we have the president and COO of Sun, directly answering critics and showing off hardware still in the lab. Talk about your De-cloaking and getting personal

As predicted in Cluetrain and elsewhere, the companies that fight this will die.
Jim on 09.17.04 @ 06:56 PM PST [link]


Wednesday, September 15th

Monday, September 13th

The startup timebomb


Way back at Convex, my boss, Rob Kolstad, wrote a little X app. It read a date, the current cash balance on that date, and a burn rate from a file in /etc, and then counted down the cash balance dollars in real-time. The frame of the window had a caption that read, "Dollars left until GAME OVER". Some people would leave it running in the corner of their screen.

Apparently he re-wrote it when he went to Prisma.

In my mind, all startups should have one to provide an otherwise-oft-missed dose of reality. Its too easy to focus on the size of the last round, and forget that its being gobbled at $6m/month.
Jim on 09.13.04 @ 06:34 AM PST [link]


Friday, September 10th

After the call-centre, now the IT department is off to India



In a shiny new building in the drab construction site that is Noida, a Delhi suburb, teams of young Indian engineers are, in a manner of speaking, managing the world. A number of America's best-known companies have entrusted the remote running of part of their global computing networks to HCL Comnet. This information-technology services firm is at the crest of what Gartner, a consultancy, has called “the next big wave” of Indian outsourcing deals, covering remote “infrastructure-management services”.

India's outsourcing boom started with software development and has expanded into a whole range of business services that can be handled a continent away, of which the country's hundreds of call-centres are just the most prominent examples. This takes that trend one stage further, and shifts offshore much of the administration and maintenance of a firm's IT systems. Gartner's Partha Iyengar divides remote IMS work into three categories: monitoring global network operations; providing helpdesk support and maintenance; and administering databases.



link

This seems like the logical endpoint of "lights-out (systems) management" to me. The goal at Wayport and elsewhere was to be able to manage the complete infrastructure from home, while sitting in one's underwear. The stated reason for this is to reduce the requirement for higher-level NOC staff to be present during off-hours shifts, though everyone understands the unvoiced geek detest for corporate dress code and mandatory meetings. Once the systems are enabled for management from anywhere on earth, the suits "outsource" the whole thing to the lowest bidder.

The problem, of course, is that this creates a whole new level of vender-dependence. Its no better than having Microsoft, Oracle, SAP, CA, EDS or any of the other "big IT" solutions involved, because it does nothing to break the chains binding a company's IT resources to a vendor. Its just more of the same sad old story.

Of course, many IT departments are full of inept, blundering idiots who only know how to buy the latest toys for their idle amusements. These same shITs will bleet about how overloaded they are while bitching at the people they support for each inbound request.

With spend-and-moan creatures like this in-place, its no wonder that "IT" has earned the reputation it currently enjoys.

Jim on 09.10.04 @ 03:08 PM PST [link]


Saturday, September 4th

Preview to startup failure mode


In a failing startup, people, good and bad, eventually start running for the door. Some end up with an axe in the back due to political termination or its close cousin, the 'layoff', and some voluntarily seek higher ground for reasons of personal economic safety. Nobody enjoys being the stalwart turkey who's job it is to turn out the lights for the last time. This flight to safety leaves fewer and fewer people, mostly managers, to cover the fenceline. Out come the "Quality Initiatives" which are more about managerial platitudes and positioning than any improvement to the situation.

Using two colored markers on a white board, and admittedly somewhat intoxicated by the fumes, I recently added to the lore of the largely submerged quality improvement movement by streamlining the Plan/Do/Check/Act cycle. Conventionally, PDCA is diagrammed like a wheel, revolving and implicitly moving forward, raising the standard of quality as improvements are incorporated in a dynamic process...


By eliminating the resource intensive "plan" and "check" phases we increase efficiency and actually create a system that generates energy. A dynamic resonance is created, a vibrationback and forth at increasing frequency between the DO and ACT quadrants on the model. Rather than rolling forward in the standard boring ISO 9001 approach, this new approach creates kinetic energy within a stationary model, ultimately resulting in a highly charged process that transcends purpose. Human effort is no longer tied to the Sisyphus-ian rolling of the process up the hill of quality improvement. Tremendous production savings result. Ultimately these static processes fairly glow with their own pent up forces, waiting for cathartic release. Here is where the marketing team enters the picture, but I leave that to your imagination.


Yeah, baby. link
Jim on 09.04.04 @ 11:32 AM PST [link]


Rageboy re-discovers (ba)sh


RageBoy, my favorite deviled egg, discoverd the shell prompt in OSX.

Perhaps someone will let him know about curl. Seriously, isn't this: curl -v -u rageboy:Password -T image.jpg ftp://paanix.com/the-one.jpg easier than all that typing.
Jim on 09.04.04 @ 01:48 AM PST [link]


Friday, September 3rd

government by or of the corporation.


Found this tonight. Quoting

'Although most Americans remember that Harry Truman was Franklin D. Roosevelt's Vice President when Roosevelt died in 1945 (making Truman President), Roosevelt had two previous Vice Presidents - John N. Garner (1933-1941) and Henry A. Wallace (1941-1945). In early 1944, the New York Times asked Vice President Henry Wallace to, as Wallace noted, "write a piece answering the following questions: What is a fascist? How many fascists have we? How dangerous are they?"

Vice President Wallace's answer to those questions was published in The New York Times on April 9, 1944, at the height of the war against the Axis powers of Germany and Japan.

"The really dangerous American fascists," Wallace wrote, "are not those who are hooked up directly or indirectly with the Axis. The FBI has its finger on those. The dangerous American fascist is the man who wants to do in the United States in an American way what Hitler did in Germany in a Prussian way. The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power."'
[...]

and remember It Can't Happen Here.
Jim on 09.03.04 @ 10:45 PM PST [link]


Thursday, September 2nd

The Song is over


Back in Spokane, and man, does this town (still) suck. Some warned me to bring my flak jacket, since I am now an online corporate terrorist in the eyes of some of the locals.

But the house is now sold, and with only a few messes left to clean-up, which is why I returned.

A recently laid-off friend here took me out to lunch and bent my ear about my ragging on a certain former employer. He was non-impressed that I had promised to stop once, and didn't quite do so. He thinks its beneath me to rag on the losers.

I'll sing my song to the wide open spaces
I'll sing my heart out to the infinite sea
I'll sing my visions to the sky high mountains
I'll sing my song to the free...

So I promised him directly that I'd stop, so I will.

Rumors of a "C&D" continue to circulate, and now my former CEO wants to meet when I'm in SF next week. So it was perhaps time anyway. I've made my point, I think.

You, gentle reader, may expect more from me on wireless and similar, but the directed rants against a certain f(l)ailing start-up in Washington State hereby cease. The rocket is almost out of fuel, and apoge happened last year. There was no CATO, no Power Prang, but what we are now witnessing is a definite Land Shark/Worm Burner. I see no reason to get further entangled in the emotional stress of an uncontrolable phase of flight at far too low an altitude...

Houston, we have a problem...


The song is over
It's all behind me

I will no doubt continue to rant about WiMax and 802.11, and Intel's continued quest for any success in wireless.

Jim (out)

Jim on 09.02.04 @ 01:35 AM PST [link]



your face here Home
Archives
Where I work
RSS 1.0 FEED
Powered by gm-rss History of sorts

What I (might) drive (soon!)

Greymatter Forums

Join FSF as an Associate Member!
September 2004
SMTWTFS
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Valid XHTML 1.0!