Sex, Drugs & Unix

Sunday, August 29th

one of the risks of outsourcing


From what I gather, my former employer does a lot less outsourcing to India now, but for a while there were more off-shore contractors than on-shore employees. To be fair, the VCs made them do it, but in the process they did burn down several people who needed the jobs they lost. AFAIK, ye olde former employer didn't experience any IP loss due to their offshoring. Doesn't mean it doesn't happen to other companies that play the game of trading off profits for being involved in the community.


In a case that exposes the intellectual-property risks of outsourcing in India, a small San Carlos software company has sued Mumbai police for refusing to investigate the alleged theft of proprietary source code by an employee at its Indian subsidiary.

Sandeep Jolly, the founder and chief executive of Jolly Technologies, said U.S. technology companies should beware of the risks of doing business in his native land at a time when many are taking advantage of the cost savings of offshoring and entrusting sensitive software development and testing work to Indian contractors. Protection of intellectual property is still a new concept for lawmakers, police and prosecutors, he said.

...

link
Jim on 08.29.04 @ 01:09 AM PST [link]


Friday, August 27th

Its alive!


After a too-long hiatus, supressed by the madness and emotional hysteria that fills the vaccum vortex of a terminal love, it looks like Rageboy is back.

I couldn't be happier.


Jim on 08.27.04 @ 01:13 AM PST [link]


The Song Remains the Same


Says here that Speakeasy the enlightened DSL provider with WiFi mojo, has taken a couple million dollars from Intel.

I had a dream, Oh, yeah, Crazy dream, uh-huh.
Anything I wanted to know, Any place I needed to go


"The problem with the WiMax market is that it is extremely hyped right now," Chatterley said. "Our objective is to cut through it all and get the facts. We have a great partner in Intel that can help us do that."

I think Speakeasy is cool, and I recommend them highly, but what are the chances of this actually happening?

Hear my song. People won't you listen now? Sing along.
You don't know what you're missing now.

Intel, who can hardly claim to not be hyping WiMax, is going to help Speakeasy cut through the hype and "get the facts".

Yeah buddy.

Speakeasy's CEO continues with, “it’s fair to say we would focus on the eight to ten largest metro areas in the U.S. We don’t see WiMax as a rural opportunity for us.”

Sing out Hare Hare, dance the Hoochie Koo.
City lights are oh so bright, as we go sliding... sliding... sliding through.

Which is too bad, because thats the only place it stands a chance.

Do you know what happens when you stare Intel in the face and say, "It doesn't work like that", after they've put a ton of money in your company?

I've seen that movie.

Lest anyone forget, Intel backed HomeRF before it became obvious to even them that WiFi won, and they cut bait and invented Centrino as a placeholder.

Any little song that you know
Everything that's small has to grow.
And it has to grow! Push push, yeah!

Lets hope that Speakeasy doesn't find the same grave as Intel's last investment in a service provider in order to push WiMax.

California sunlight, sweet Calcutta rain
Honolulu starbright - the song remains the same.

Jim on 08.27.04 @ 12:42 AM PST [link]


Thursday, August 26th

Vivato Goes Wide


When I first read the headline to this story on Unstrung I thought that perhaps the voodoo of a 16 element system had returned, now that anyone who would point out the
essentially silly notion that paying for 2X the components for a 3dBi gain has left the building.

But no, its just more of the same old ... stuff.

The firm used six of these outdoor boxes and a "handful" of its microcells and picocells to cover 1,500 square miles in Walla Walla, Wash., according to Kevin Ryan, VP of marketing and business development.


Some basic calculations are in order. 1,500 square miles is what you get from an area that is 38.8 miles square. If Vivato's claims are to be believed, then each switch would need to cover 250 square miles (we'll ignore the 'hole-fillers' mentioned in the article).

250 square miles requires that each coverage area by each switch (wait, no, *basestation*) needs to illuminate a 15.8 mile x 15.8 mile area. The diagonal across this "square" is 22.4 miles. The LOS pathloss at 2.4GHz over 22.4 miles is approximately 131.5dB, and the strongest 11b client card I know of will only transmit 23dBm. This means that Vivato would have to, without using anything but antenna gain and receiver sensitivity, recover the signal at -108dBm when it arrives at the "basestation".

The claim is possible in-theory, but requires an environment about as pristine as that found inside an RF-shielded room, and allows for almost no fade margin. Perhaps Walla Walla, Wa. offers this, but the numbers look like the aftermath of a mastrubatory whiteboard session to me. Maybe they've put antennas on the "smaller units", and this is how they accomplish the somewhat fantastic ranges.

Or perhaps the coverage was not, in-fact, ubiquitous. The press release on Vivato's site only claims 2.5 miles of coverage from any product:


With Vivato's Wi-Fi base stations, which provide up to 2.5 miles of wireless coverage outdoors, and Vivato's Wi-Fi micro and pico cells for shorter ranges, customers can now access the Internet at broadband speeds.


and then, in the next paragraph:


"Constructing a wireless network covering 3,700 square miles is a challenging proposition, given the immense coverage area," said Tom Husted, chief executive officer of Columbia REA. "With Vivato's base station and micro and pico cell solution, we are able to provide up to 20 miles of wireless coverage outdoors - this enabled us to deliver a cost-effective wireless broadband service to our greater community - including residential home users, our rural farm customers, as well as our large, irrigated agriculture and commercial customers.


So the press release is in-conflict with itself. Which is it, 2.5 miles or 20 miles? 1,500 square miles, or 3,700 square miles? And why is it that these web-based "technology reporters" don't ask these questions?

Enquiring minds want to know.
Jim on 08.26.04 @ 06:50 PM PST [link]


Wednesday, August 25th

Cabert/Ballet


Isaac Butler at Parabasis links to a story from yesterday’s New York Times. In brief, the article describes a new wrinkle in fundraising: auctioning off the artists themselves. And I mean literally.

Last February, at the Atlanta Ballet’s annual gala, Lynda Courts saw an item up for auction that she just could not refuse. The evening’s performance was “Romeo and Juliet,” and Romeo himself was on offer.

“Much to my husband’s consternation I kept bidding,” said Ms. Courts, who has been on the board of the Atlanta Ballet for 20 years.

Five minutes and $3,000 later, Ms. Courts held a photograph of her prize: John Welker, the evening’s star, whom she had purchased the right to “sponsor” for the next year. (She got a deal. At the Atlanta Ballet, dancers of Mr. Welker’s stature usually go for $10,000 a year.)

“I had so much fun running up to John saying: ‘Guess what? I own you!’ ” Ms. Courts recalled. “He said, ‘What are you talking about?’ I said: ‘I bought you at the auction. I’m your sponsor for the year.’ We had a great time laughing and talking about that.”

In an interview, Mr. Welker sounded genuinely enthusiastic about the affiliation. “To be associated with her is an honor,” he said. Still, he said: “It was weird at first. You use the word ‘auction off.’ I don’t know how to use that word appropriately. It sounds kind of bad.”


From prima ballerina to ecdysiast? Is that the plan? And why not? Degradation of fineness gives an added thrill for those who must resort to purchased pleasures.

In playwright Jean Genet’s (made famous by Bowie's "Jean Genie") world we’re all prostitutes of one sort or another, so this is just another form of recognizing that fact of life. In my world, this turn on fundraising tactics just oozes "ick".

Let's dance    For fear your grace should fall
Let's dance    For fear tonight is all

Jim on 08.25.04 @ 02:44 AM PST [link]


Monday, August 23rd

replacing Google


Here is an interesting perspective on Internet search engines. It gives one pause for thought.

I listened to Jim Gray on IT Conversations last night. While overall the talked seemed to drag, I was struck by the fact that he kept talking about Google, SETI @ Home and (the old) Napster, but didn't connect that it would be possible, with a bit of open source software, to construct a replacement for Google that is both distributed, and larger than Google could ever be.

Consider what would happen if Microsoft were to couple their search research (no pun intended) with a distributed p2p platform hosted on Windows. Through its operating system monopoly, Microsoft controls approximately 90% of the machines attached to the Internet. What would happen if they managed to configure those 50 million PCs into a distributed storage and computation service, used for their own search engine?

Now what if the service was only available to users of Internet Explorer?

AOL could pull off a similar stunt, though at a somewhat reduced scale, since they only have about 20 million subscribers. They are in a bit more 'control' of how often people update the AOL software, compared to Microsoft's ability to field-update operating system platforms.

Still, lets assume the Microsoft or AOL managed to usurp only 5 million desktops, and that the average CPU on these is a 1GHz Pentium 3 equivalent with 256MB of RAM and 20GB of HDD.

Now reduce those numbers to 1 million units to account for redudnancy, etc.

Its still a lot of CPU power. And its free.

Will Google be replaced by something Napster-like? Not if what it offers people is free search, they already have that. But what if Microsoft *paid* you $100/year for the idle cycles in your desktop?

They could certainly afford this, its only $500M/year. This is 1% of Microsoft's cash reserves. But they don't even need to spend money to make it happen. They could give away software. Upgrade to XP for free if you'll run our search software on your machine.

They could set minimum standards for qualifying hardware this way. You'ld need to turn over a 2GHz P4 equivalent, and furnish them with 10GB of your disk space and their own 256MB of ram, and some always-on broadband connection. Sure, they end up giving away 100M XP "Search edition" licenses, but these could just be "XP Home Edition" crippled in some way. Most of the people who will upgrade to XP have. Microsoft gets to count incremental units ("more than 100M additional licenses of XP") and build a "search computer" larger than Google can afford.
Jim on 08.23.04 @ 05:06 PM PST [link]


Sunday, August 22nd

more on free WiFi


The man, the one and only blogfather tries free WiFi in Panera bread, and starts to understand that WiFi is free.

Glenn goes on to very aptly wonders whether Starbuck's will continue its T-Mobile partnership, if it creates a competitive vulnerability in their real line of business. Schlotzsky's program was a direct shot across the bow of Starbucks and T-Mobile.

This is what happens when the market tips towards free. I think the Starbucks/T-Mobile partnership will continue, but the price will drop such that its free, or gives the appearance of being free.

A similar thing is happening in the hotel space. Omni, Wyndham, Clarion Hotels and Comfort Suites, Best Western, Hampton Inns, Holiday Inn Express, Microtel Inns and Suites, West Coast Hotels/Red Lion, La Quinta, and some Courtyard, Residence Inn, Spring Hill Suites, Fairfield Inn and Towne Place Suites by Marriott all have free WiFi available to their guests and visitors. While the

In the airline space, I believe that the airlines *themselves* will install networks for their applications (queue-busting, for instance), and that through the magic of multiple-ESSIDs and bandwidth control, will make these same networks available to their passengers, or at least the "frequent fliers" amoung them.

Wither Wayport, T-Mobile, and STSN, along with the other, smaller players in the for-pay hotspot space? Well, Wayport's recent "Wi-Fi World" is a move toward free (or the appearance of free). If someone you already have a billing relationship with "picks up" your WiFi service in McDonalds and other locations, you'll be has happy to use these as locations that are simply an AP slapped on the end of a DSL line. Wi-Fi World is Wayport's tacit admission that WiFi networks are free.

"But why would anyone pay Wayport to install and operate a network for which there is no charge?", you may ask. The answer is both simple and disturbing. It turns out that not everyone uses the network for good. There are people who will use a free network for their actions involving copyright infringement and trading p0rn involving those under the age of 18.

Yes, unfortunately, it does happen.

Having an organization that can answer these requests (or better take them off the hands of the venue owner) might be worth a couple hundred per month, especially if the free WiFi is adding more than that to the bottom line.

More on this front later.

Jim on 08.22.04 @ 05:03 PM PST [link]


Sunday, August 15th

PowerPoint was bad, this is worse


Saw this on /. Instant Effects a firm of hard-hitting CG execs has released the ultimate fluff job, OfficeFX.

The existing animations with PowerPoint were bad enough, now we have a variant of PP that will only run on high-end hardware. My problem with all of this is that 90% of the time (or more) PP is a crutch for the presenter. (I really don't need you to read the slides to me, thanks.) The backgrounds, colors and animations only make things worse.

Now this, embedded AVI files with rippling or flame effects.

Is this what you want to leave behind in the brains of your potential customers, management, or staff? Yet another twist on flaming logos?

As Doc said, its the story, stupid.

A few other links to consider.
Jim on 08.15.04 @ 05:06 PM PST [link]



Wednesday, August 11th

linux in hawaii



So I've run into the local linux crowd, and lets just say that the amount of linux on Oahu is a lot closer to Austin than Spokane.

Now to get some community wireless going.
Jim on 08.11.04 @ 02:55 AM PST [link]


Tuesday, August 10th

Meru magic?



Nancy Gohring reports that Meru Avoids Mixed Traffic Penalties


The Meru AP virtually separates 802.11g and 802.11b traffic on a per packet basis. Because the packets don’t see each other, the 802.11g traffic doesn’t switch to a backward compatibility mode, which would require it to communicate with the AP in a way that creates overhead that typically slows down traffic in a mixed environment, said Sarah Kim, senior marketing manager for Meru. Because it is waiting for a patent, Meru is reluctant to disclose more about how the AP works, she said.


And

Chipmaker Engim avoids the problems that typically occur in mixed environments by separating the traffic onto different channels. But Meru is using a single channel, Kim said.

I've covered Engim's problems here before. Its good that we're told that Meru uses a single channel.

For high speeds, 802.11g uses orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM), just as 802.11a does. But the protection signal has to be receivable by 802.11b clients, meaning it must be sent using their complementary code keying (CCK) waveform.

The 'slowdown' in 802.11g networks comes when there is but a single 802.11b STA associated with an 802.11g AP. Once this happens, the AP is required to advise all 11g STAs to send "protection" frame (a CTS-to-self frame) ahead of any transmission. This protection mechanism is used to prevent 802.11b clients from transmitting on top of an OFDM transmission. The 11b radios can't decode the preamble from an OFDM packet, so they potentially don't "know" that an 11g/OFDM device is already transmitting.

The standard allows one to turn the protection mechanism off, but its inadvisable if there will be a mix of 11g and 11b clients in the area. Otherwise, range will be impacted when a distant 11b STAs doesn't get CCA set, and transmits on top of an 11g STA attempting to communicate with its AP.

Potentially, Meru has taken the multiple-BSSID idea that I once patented, and used it to provide two virtual APs on one radio. The first virtual AP is a standard 11b AP. It beacons 11b frames, advertises only 11b rates, etc. If a STA attempts to associate at an 11b rate (probe responses, etc), it is associated with the 11b BSSID (and virtual AP). The other 'virtual' AP is an 11g AP, and only accepts assocations from 11g clients. (I'm leaving the details out here, email me for a fuller discussion.)

Thus, all 11b-only clients are associated with BSSID-b, and all 11g-capabile clients are associated with BSSID-g. BSSID-g is configured to never send protection frames, and never advise its associated STAs to do do, and Meru makes its claim.

The problem is that a distant 11b client may attempt to uplink (toward the AP) while an 11g client is already uplinking. Since the 11g STA didn't send a protection frame, and is potentially somewhat distant from the 11b STA (such that the 11b STAs energy detect threshold isn't met), the 11b STA thinks the "air is clear", and sends its frame, smashing the frame that the 11g STA was sending.

Throughput drops.

There is a reason for these protection frames. They're not included in the standard because Task Group g wanted to slow the throughput of 802.11g. Rather, they know that the wireless is a very expensive media to cross, and sacrificing a bit of throughput in order to get the packet through the first time is the right choice.

I could be wrong on the above, since everything I know about Meru is from their website, and they don't provide the details. I'm just thinking out loud here.






Jim on 08.10.04 @ 06:49 PM PST [link]


Monday, August 9th

I like big brains


Jessica Simpson is supposedly smarter than Einstein but the reality is that Ms. Simpson is another example of the brains + beauty = constant conjecture.

Erika Ebbels may be the exception that proves the rule. This MIT alum (Chemistry) recently won "Miss Mass", and has set her sights on winning "Miss America".

When asked about the bimbo mantra accociated with the pagents, she responded, "Look, I'm all for world peace. I'm also for stem cell research, and I can explain, with significant detail, the scientific reasons behind my opinion."

Pix here and here


I like big brains and I cannot lie,
and you other nerds can't deny,
when a girl solves a quadratic equation in her head,
and knows the atomic mass of lead,
I get sprung,
the girl is grammatically correct with her tongue,
and likes to talk about the evils the Bush Administrations done...


(Or a better rif on the Mix-a-lot classic.)

You go girl.

"Beauty can't amuse you, but brainwork -- reading, writing, thinking -- can." --Helen Gurley Brown
Jim on 08.09.04 @ 04:27 AM PST [link]


Saturday, August 7th

See you @ Starf**ks


airpwn is a utility demoed at Defcon 12. It replaces every image loaded by a user of a WiFi network with the infamous goatse.cx.

The potential for big fun at your local hotspot is unlimited.


Jim on 08.07.04 @ 02:11 AM PST [link]


Vivato performance for under $600, a tale


And now the story must be told.

In March of 2003, it was becoming more and more evident that Vivato's first product was not going to deliver on the promise. The situation was so bad that I wrote an absolute flamer to the then-CEO, Ken Biba, explaining some of the real-world issues with the 1st generation product, and proposing a new and different product. That memo resulted in what eventually became Vivato's second 'switch' product.

Still, the internal fans of the first product perservered. Whenever anyon would raise technical concerns, or a concern about the manufacturability of the first-generation product, the answer was always refrain; "We can do it".

Bob Conley tried to get me fired for leading Vivato down the commodity path. He didn't like the second generation product. Reports are that it is meeting with some success, despite Bob's concern. I hear that sales of the second generation switch (which is still indoor-only) sales are picking up, and that a backlog exists. This is better than the situation with the first-generation switch, where the 'backlog' is the warehouse. Several hundred still exist, like forlorn puppies in a window of a pet shop. Built and paid-for, still stitting in boxes, waiting for a customer. VC dollars hard at work, transformed into inventory that nobody will buy.

There were still real problems with the product operating in its "three simultaneous beams" mode. No technical arguement seemed to sway the deciples of the third beam from their "We can do it" mantra. Both I and others made repeated whiteboard arguments why "three simultaneous beams" wasn't ever going to work.

Three channel (three simultaneous beams) had become a religion, and the zealots had the floor.

In April of 2003, I proposed a test. Those who knew me, and my agenda thought I was being as wicked as they'd ever seen. Phil, my boss at the time, actually labeled me "wicked". Those who were members of the opposing religion, the Agilent/metropolitan broadband faithfull were about to get a wake-up call. What I proposed was this:

We take a fresh-built, tuned-as-they-like, 1st-generatin Vivato switch, and pit it against something that I would come up with "off-the-shelf". I had a budget of $2,000.00 .vs the $9,000.00 to $14,0000 Vivato product. The Vivato product had to either have twice the range, or twice the throughput at the same range.

Everyone agreed that the Vivato switch would need at least this much advantage to demonstrate its value proposition.

So, I borrowed a Cisco AP350 (we had several internally), and went googling for a set of high-gain waveguide antennas. I remember simply hoping that someone had made a commercial variant of Trevor Marshall's waveguide for the 2.4GHZ ISM band. On page 3 or 4 of the 2nd or 3rd Google search I tried, I hit pay-dirt. I found a company named Securawave who had just started shipping a waveguide antenna in two different gains, at the time, 15dBi and 18dBi. (Securawave have since upped the advertised gain on these antennas to 18dBi and 21dBi.)

Not wanting to expose Vivato to a competitor, I checked with my manager, and once approval was given (Ken Biba also chimed in), I purchased them through Netgate. I purchased 4 of the 8-slot, and two of the 16 slot "multi-beam" antennas from Securawave. We really did have early units, when they arrived none of the antennas had a serial number higher than '10'. These antennas cost $250 to $325 each, the same then as now.

At the time, a Cisco AP350 could be had for approximately $725. I also purchased a set of rp-tnc to N cable assemblies from Hyperlink, these may have been $20 to $25 each. At $1300 total, I beat the cost target.

Several people inside the company though I should re-use some of the ridgeguide antennas off Vivato's early prototypes. I considered it, but I decided that this violated the "off-the-shelf" aspect of the experiment. I didn't want anyone coming back to ponder that getting a waveguide antenna built would stop someone.

When the testing was over, the results were discouraging. The Cisco AP with the waveguides had about 20% more range than the Vivato switch. The Vivato could only manage about 25% more aggrigate throughput, and thus, the Vivato product failed the test. Vivato was beat by less than $2000 of off-the-shelf equipment.

But we shipped it anyway. Vivato's future was on the line, there was a round of VC financing to close. There was some softening of the "three beam" position though. The Vivato switch now ships as a "two beam" product. The problems are still there, but they aren't as noticible in a 'two beam" configuration. Zealotry won, as it often will.

Those of you who want to clone the system that beat Vivato can easily do so. Just over a year later, one can now come within 3dB of the (claimed) first-genration Vivato performance for less than $600. Given the heavy self-interference inside Vivato's first-generation switch when operated in anything but the "single-beam" mode, the performance may well be beter. As always, your milage may vary.

The Securawave antennas are available (and we still sell them at Netgate), and the guys at Securawave report that they best Vivato at nearly every opportunity.

Additionally, and at my urging, Poynting has developed and started manufacturing their own waveguide antenna. Netgate will be carrying this antenna as well. I have an early sample here in Hawaii, and its a sweet little unit. Couple either up to the HS3000, and you'll have a less than $600 solution that will run with Vivato's $14,000 outdoor solution or their $9,000 indoor switch.

In previous posts, I've pointed out the flaws in attempting metropolitan deployment in the unlicensed band. Apparently my words have received some amount attention both in Spokane and elswhere. A reporter for the Spokane newspaper, the Spokesman Review, called to ask me several questions. He's queing up a story, and I apparently play a part.

He's asked other locals for their opinion, with 180 Network's Chad Skidmore responding that while I have several accurate points, he thinks that Vivato can fix the problem "in software". Unfortunately, Mr. Skidmore is mistaken. The problems happen before any layer of software can run. They are indemic to the design of the receiver system.

The reporter will also likely paint me as a disgruntled former employee. While it is true that I am disgruntled, and a former employee, my reasons for continuing to post these articles are my own. And on that subject, two things:

First, I am far less disgruntled now that I have cleared the county line. Spokane sucks. Nuff said.

Second, my posts about Vivato aren't so much "get back" but rather "fair warning" to any who read to be careful. Investigate, ask questions. its your money, after all. And should Don come waltzing into your company next, perhaps you'll know more than we did.

Don, after all, is the man who said he fired the former VP of Sales because he "didn't know how to sandbag". In sales, "sandbagging" is the unethical practice of artifically holding the quota system low, or just grazing over quota in a given time period so as not to fall short the next, or otherwise advantage oneself of the bonus-based quota system. Sandbagging is not a behavior you want in your VP of Sales. Yet Don announced this as the reason for sacking Greg. Greg is now enjoying great success at BelAir and oft claims that its refreshing to have a product to sell that works as promised.

But back to money, Vivato held another layoff yesterday (Friday), with it went Vivato's last hope of any new product development. Vivato laid off Siavash Alamouti and eight others, as well as 8 of the 12 contractors from Mindpath. Siavash and four of the eight were amoung the brightest technical minds that ever worked at Vivato. One of the people affected sent this message back to those who remain:

I still remember the first standards meeting after we announced
Vivato, when everybody used to crowd around me, every singe break
period, like I was a rockstar, and I kept repeating, "No changes to
client card!" J Boy! - What fun! it has been an exciting two years for
me. I changed my definition of feasibility couple of times over and
over, leant humility, tasted ignorance, now its time to ride on.

The end result of this is that there won't be a lot of new product development coming out of Vivato. The pile of cash is too small, and now the only people who could have designed a product that worked have been dismissed.

I am told that part of the reason that Siavash is gone is that he was at odd's with Don Stalter's plans to turn the company into a metropolitan deployment company. Siavash is, in a word, too honest for Don to continue to endorse his presence. Siavash knows that Vivato's current products won't work in metro-broadband deployments. He must had said so, and Siavash got the axe today. In Stalter's company, there is only room for Stalter's opinion. The man sneered at me once when I countered his opinion with fact, and I do mean the lips thinned, full teeth barred "snear" move. It was animalistic. I would have made a fist and smacked hard across that thin little mouth of his, but for the simple reason that I abhored giving him an excuse for all that has happened since.

I am sure that the world has not heard the last of Siavash. As 802.11n continues to gain traction, the man who invented "Alamouti's technique", the single most efficient MIMO system possible, is sure to find a new position. If you're a VC, and want a chance at owning the MIMO/802.11n market, let me know, and I'll get you in-touch, but move fast, Siavash already has interviews lined-up.

The rumor mill says that in order to keep the seat warm, Don Stalter is hiring Ron Rudokas, formerly of Vistard. Those of you reading this from behind the wall, or who are fellow escapees will recognize the name. Vistard was founded to exploit Vivato's advantages in deployment of metropolitan broadband. When the Vivato product didn't work, Vistard failed to obtain funding, and the whole thing went nowhere. The way it looks from here, Mr. Rudokas is joining Vivato to pursue the dream, but Mr. Rudokas is no replacement for Mr. Alamouti.

To fill other positions, Don Stalter continues to hire his friends from former companies. Other new executives to Vivato are Steffen Rasmussen, as Sr. VP of Engineering, and Doug Smidl, formerly of ADC Telecommunications, Don's employer prior to Terawave. Given this behavior, I now openly question if Vivato's VCs are watching their investment, or if they have given up.

More yes-men dressed as chiefs, but fewer indians by the day. Not a formula for success I've read about in any of my favorite business books.

Don apparently promised the company Friday that Vivato would IPO, and the remaining employees would all be rich. I wish this could be true, but the market would need to value Vivato at more than $100M before any of the common shareholders would receive a dime. Given what I know, the company lacks the revenue to justify that kind of valuation and I find it suprising that Don would make this promise, given that it is quite probably, "actionable".

From what I hear, without additional cash, they'll be lucky to be in business in 12 months. If you're still there, the time to get out is now. Its over.

I've now said all I ever intend to say about Vivato, and Don Stalter. You won't hear more from me on the subject unless they foolishly decide to attempt to sue me over my postings, or a small annoucement here when they finally fail. I have but one condition, don't use ex employees to spin your culture. Three of the four people pictured no longer work at Vivato. Clean it up, Don. (And he did.)
Jim on 08.07.04 @ 01:26 AM PST [link]


Sunday, August 1st

Mojo mosh networking


Thanks, but I just got my crayons back. I'm happy now, thanks.

The better line from his essay; "Companies that squelch creativity can no longer compete with companies that champion creativity." has strong echos from Weinberger's Cluetrain chapter on the hyperlinked organization.

Business sounds different these days.

The words at meetings have an edge. The language used with customers is unfiltered. The e-mails are pithy, often piercing.

Where once bombastic self-confidence got you taken seriously, now being funny does.


Or did, before it all came crashing down.

Around 10pm, (just as I was starting the last load of laundry) I received a response to a post I made to one of the many mailing lists I'm on The entire response was, "Don't you ever sleep?". Something I've heard before, many, many times. I've never been much for the 9-5 lifestyle. I prefer to work as the muse directs, or otherwise bashes me over the head with a a cluestick. At Wayport, I oft retorted, "I can sleep when I'm dead." Some there seemed bothered that I might be working more than they did. Try to keep (it) up, man.

In fact, I got a lot done after my response to the interogotory on my sleeping habits, not all of it work-related. Call this "a night in the life".

1) I changed, walked down to the pool, and swam (alone and in the dark) for about 45 minutes. Watched the clouds blow out to sea, while floating on my back. After which,
2) I walked back to the condo, showered (its a salt-water pool), got dressed, and headed over to "Boardriders Bar and Grill" in Kailua.

Friday night's fare was Ooklah the Moc, a local roots/dub/reggae band. They were good listening, and frankly, the mere fact that I can wander 4 miles to hear live reggae is reason enough to live here. Last night was decidedly different. "Mister Meaner", a local punk band of some noteriety was playing. They were good (not quite loud enough). I downed 5 beers while checking the cleavage, then, courage and caution to the wind, entered the pit.

Its been 10 years since I was in a pit. Ten years since I toured with Lollapalooza '94, as part of the Electric Carnival. I was the Internet Roadie and ten years younger then. Last night I was wearing flip-flops and faced with the blunt reality that, at 42, I am old enough to have sired everyone else in the pit. The man said, "The person who doesn't scatter the morning dew will not comb gray hairs.", and I have quite a few to comb, thanks.

3) Gonzo. No excuses. I went in.

The pit is successful in ways that cultural diversity seminars, sensitivity training, The Rainbow Coalition, and Affirmative Action programs are not. In the pit, people of all races come together to interact physically and intellectually. In the pit, all men are equal.

4) After that, I went grocery shopping,
5) drove home,
6) fixed a sandwich,
7) watched Eastwood in "Fistfull of Dollars" in HDTV,
8) and went to bed.

Not that you care, but this is an exposition on my sleep habits, and I do sleep.

Woke this morning to an e-mail greeting from Todd at Geek News Central. Todd also lives on Oahu, and works mere miles from where we live. Its good to know there are other geeks on the island.

Aloha, y'all.
Jim on 08.01.04 @ 05:14 PM PST [link]


more on beamforming for mesh networks


Microsoft had a summit on Mesh networking back in June. I didn't attend, but Jim Kajiya presented his ideas and results on "Commondity class Phased Array Antennas". In the video he does pick on Vivato's cost structure some. In fairness, Kujiya admits that the phased array he's designed he's designed isnt' fast enough to packet switch. (Speed is one of the primary reasons that Vivato uses beam switching.)

The PowerPoint slides that go with his talk are mis-linked. The real link is here.
Jim-Bob sez, "check it out".

Jim also thinks you should check out RTM's talk on MIT's Roofnet project. Video here, slides are here.

Click project (used in Roofnet) is one of the slickest bits of networking code I've ever read. Coming soon (watch this space): OLSR with ETX all pre-packaged and pretty.

Mesh will win, though not with 802.11 as a MAC. Kujiya's inexpensive phased array would probably work fine if the transmits were scheduled, and this requires a non-802.11 MAC. Turns out that madwifi makes this possible. And madwifi has recently been forked to work with Click. Mesh with phased arrays (yeilding a highly directional pattern) will be is a marriage made in heaven. Phased array Access Points can only really solve the problems of 802.11g in Enterprise-like settings or other large indoor environments.

Touch with greatness department: RTM once worked at Convex, the summer before I started work there. He left his dresser behind in the house where he lived (and I moved into). I still had it until I left it behind in Spokane.

Jim on 08.01.04 @ 01:33 AM PST [link]



your face here Home
Archives
Where I work
RSS 1.0 FEED
Powered by gm-rss History of sorts

What I (might) drive (soon!)

Greymatter Forums

Join FSF as an Associate Member!
August 2004
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Valid XHTML 1.0!