Sex, Drugs & Unix

Home » Archives » May 2004 » Window considered harmful (redux)

[Previous entry: "Germany plans to fine brothels with no apprentices"] [Next entry: "HTML O' the day"]

05/03/2004: "Window considered harmful (redux)"


This off the NANOG list:

From: Sean Donelan
Date: Mon May 03 22:10:09 2004

On Mon, 3 May 2004, Rob Thomas wrote:
> ] Just because a machine has a bot/worm/virus that didn't come with a
> ] rootkit, doesn't mean that someone else hasn't had their way with it.
>
> Agreed.

Won't help. What's the first thing people do after re-installing
the operating system (still have all the original CDs and keys and
product activation codes and and and)?

Connect to the Internet to download the patches. Time to download patches
60+ minutes. Time to infection 5 minutes. Patches are Microsoft's
intellectual property and can not be distributed by anyone without
Microsoft's permission.

Ok, so you order Microsoft's patch CD. Unfortunately it only includes
patches through October 2003.

Microsoft is selling over 10 million Windows licenses every month.
Patches not included.


your face here Home
Archives
Where I work
RSS 1.0 FEED
Powered by gm-rss History of sorts

What I (might) drive (soon!)

Greymatter Forums

Join FSF as an Associate Member!
May 2004
SMTWTFS
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Valid XHTML 1.0!